9. Experimental procedures Why (provide rationale for procedures). examples
For each experimental group, including controls, describe the procedures in enough detail to allow others to replicate them, including:
Example 1
“Because of the very small caliber of the murine tail veins, partial paravenous injection is common if 18F-FDG is administered by tail vein injection (intravenous). This could have significantly biased our comparison of the biodistribution of 18F-FDG under various conditions. Therefore, we used intraperitoneal injection of 18F-FDG for our experiments evaluating the influence of animal handling on 18F-FDG biodistribution.” [1]
Example 2
“Since Xenopus oocytes have a higher potential for homologous recombination than fertilized embryos…we next tested whether the host transfer method could be used for efficient HDR-mediated knock-in. We targeted the C-terminus of X. laevis Ctnnb1 (β-catenin), a key cytoskeletal protein and effector of the canonical Wnt pathway, because previous studies have shown that addition of epitope tags to the C-terminus do not affect the function of the resulting fusion protein (Fig…)…CRISPR components were injected into X. laevis oocytes followed by host transfer or into embryos.” [2]
- Fueger BJ, Czernin J, Hildebrandt I, Tran C, Halpern BS, Stout D, Phelps ME and Weber WA (2006). Impact of animal handling on the results of 18F-FDG PET studies in mice. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. https://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/47/6/999.long
- Aslan Y, Tadjuidje E, Zorn AM and Cha SW (2017). High-efficiency non-mosaic CRISPR-mediated knock-in and indel mutation in F0 Xenopus. Development. doi: 10.1242/dev.152967